Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:582 (6 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7439.582
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORHall et al say that little is known about the effects of low doses of radiation or a possible threshold value, ignoring a large body of scientific evidence.1
Muller said in 1955 that radiation produces permanent changes, mutations, no matter how long or how short a time the total dose was receivedmore than 99% are harmful, causing some functional impairment.2 A survey by Stewart et al followed in 1958, the first human study documenting cancer and leukaemia in children whose mothers had been exposed to in utero x ray of only 1-2 rad.3 In 1969-70 Gofman presented several studies to congressional committees dealing with low dose issues and authored five books on human health effects, the latest linking at least 50% of cancers and ischaemic heart disease to the primary co-action of medical x rays.4 Recently 15 cancer experts published a review confirming these earlier warnings, indicating there
Lynn Howard Ehrle, senior policy analyst (pro bono)
National Association for Public Health Policy, 8888 Mayflower Drive, Plymouth, MI 48170, USA ehrlebird@comcast.net