BMJ  2004;328:533-534 (6 March), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7439.533

Editorial

The human tissue bill

Criminal sanctions linked to opaque legislation threaten research

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

The new human tissue bill is making its way towards the statute book for England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Although a necessary response to the organ retention scandal involving the Royal Liverpool Children's NHS Trust, this bill goes far wider than tissues derived from post mortems.¹ It applies to any material that contains human cells—even urine and sputum. Using such material for research or for training not "incidental to the diagnostic process" will be a criminal offence unless "appropriate" consent has been obtained. Possible penalties include three years in jail. Punitive criminal sanctions coupled with opaque legislation threaten ethical and essential research as well as routine NHS activities. Incidental and appropriate have yet to be defined by a new human tissue authority, which will have powers of licensing and inspection. But the government has repeatedly said that consent must be explicit,² even in relation to medical training using residual blood . . . [Full text of this article]

Department of Pathology, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester LE5 4PW (peter.furness@leicester.ac.uk)

Research Management and Planning Directorate, Cancer Research UK, London WC2A 3PX (Richard.Sullivan@cancer.org.uk)

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Universal consent form might help

Ian M Frayling
BMJ 2004 328: 1203. [Extract] [Full Text]

Human tissue bill has impact on professional examinations

Timothy R Helliwell
BMJ 2004 328: 898. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Hoeyer, K. (2009). Informed Consent: The Making of a Ubiquitous Rule in Medical Practice. Organization 16: 267-288 [Abstract]  
• Bell, M D D (2006). Emergency medicine, organ donation and the Human Tissue Act.. Emerg. Med. J. 23: 824-827 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Bell, M D D (2006). The UK Human Tissue Act and consent: surrendering a fundamental principle to transplantation needs?. J. Med. Ethics 32: 283-286 [Full text]  
• Hock, Y L, Balachandar, C, Dicken, S, Bayley, C, Ramaiah, S (2005). Patients' perspective of pathology specimens. A prospective study. J. Clin. Pathol. 58: 891-893 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Hall, D M B (2005). Children, rights, and responsibilities. Arch. Dis. Child. 90: 171-173 [Full text]  
• Frayling, I. M (2004). Universal consent form might help. BMJ 328: 1203-1203 [Full text]  
• Helliwell, T. R (2004). Human tissue bill has impact on professional examinations. BMJ 328: 898-898 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

If post-mortem tissue and 'surgical waste' are treated alike...

Peter N Furness
bmj.com, 5 Mar 2004 [Full text]

Human Tissue use in Professional Examinations

Timothy R Helliwell
bmj.com, 7 Mar 2004 [Full text]

Lack of logic

John H Scotson
bmj.com, 10 Mar 2004 [Full text]

The Hunan Tissue Bill: a bad law that will harm medicine

Amanda Herbert
bmj.com, 23 Mar 2004 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>