BMJ  2004;328:512-514 (28 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7438.512

Education and debate

Mentoring to reduce antisocial behaviour in childhood

Helen Roberts, professor1, Kristin Liabo, research fellow1, Patricia Lucas, research officer1, David DuBois, associate professor2, Trevor A Sheldon, professor3

1 Child Health Research and Policy Unit, Institute of Health Sciences, City University, London EC1A 7QN, 2 Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health (MC 923), University of Illinois at Chicago, 1603 W Taylor St, Chicago, IL 60612-4324, USA, 3 Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York YO10 5DD

Correspondence to: H Roberts h.roberts@city.ac.uk

The effects of social interventions need to be examined in real life situations as well as studies

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Politicians and policy makers are increasingly interested in evidence based decision making. They are under pressure to look to research for solutions to policy problems and justify programmes by reference to the knowledge base. It is tempting for policy makers to grasp any research on seemingly intractable social problems, however slim, in the hope of finding simple solutions. Rolling out national programmes based on inadequate evidence can, however, do more harm than good. We use the example of mentoring for young people with, or at risk of, antisocial behaviour problems to show the potential dangers of running ahead of the evidence.

Public health interventions to improve outcomes for children are an example of policy and research evolving in tandem.1-3 Interventions such as Highscope, Headstart, parenting education, home visiting, and mentoring have been well designed and robustly evaluated, some of them by randomised controlled trials.4-10 Nevertheless, parent education, home visiting, and . . . [Full text of this article]

-->
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

What doesn't work and how to show it
Phil Alderson and Trish Groves
BMJ 2004 328: 473. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Bouffard, J. A., Bergseth, K. J. (2008). The Impact of Reentry Services on Juvenile Offenders' Recidivism. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 6: 295-318 [Abstract]  
  • Alderson, P., Groves, T. (2004). What doesn't work and how to show it. BMJ 328: 473-473 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

"Belief" in mentoring and antisocial behavior may both be increasing...
James M. Howard
bmj.com, 27 Feb 2004 [Full text]
Conclusions Don't Match the Evidence
Rey A. Carr
bmj.com, 10 Mar 2004 [Full text]
Matching what we know with what we do
Kristin Liabo, et al.
bmj.com, 8 Apr 2004 [Full text]
Limitations Not Adequately Addressed
Rey A. Carr
bmj.com, 16 May 2004 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ