Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:483 (28 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7438.483-a
Clare Dyer, legal correspondent
BMJ
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Pressure was mounting this week for a full inquiry after the revelation that the lead investigator in a controversial UK study on alleged links between autism, bowel disease, and the measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccine had failed to disclose that he was also carrying out investigations for lawyers hoping to sue over vaccine damage.
Andrew Wakefield's study of 12 children, published in the Lancet ( 1998;351: 637)[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline], provoked a huge media controversy that was followed by a substantial fall-off in the percentage of children given the triple vaccine.
Last week the Lancet's editor, Richard Horton, said he would not have published the paper had he known that Dr Wakefield had a contract for up to £55 000 ($102 700;
81 800) from the legal aid board (now the legal services commission) to carry out tests on 10 children for a group action against vaccine manufacturers. Dr Wakefield
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses