Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:464 (21 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7437.464-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORWe thank everyone who contributed to the rapid response debate on bmj.com.1 Many of the responses related to homophobia in medicine. The editorial was designed to raise awareness of the healthcare needs of women who have sex with women rather than to stimulate a debate about the morality of homosexuality.
Varney's comments on accessibility and appropriateness of care provided by an informed clinical workforce are apposite.
Malterud expressed justified concern about the appropriateness of the conclusions we drew using the restricted epidemiological data available. We agree that epidemiological data concerning sexuality and health outcomes are difficult to gather and interpret.
We are pleased Frisch brought attention to a Danish study that was not published at the time of our submission and is the only population based study in this area listed in Medline. It shows that women who have sex with women are not at higher risk
Clare Hughes, final year medical student
Guy's, King's, and St Thomas's School of Medicine, London clarehughes@journalist.com
Amy Evans, specialist registrar, genitourinary medicine
Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds LS1 3EX amy.evans@leedsth.nhs.uk