BMJ  2004;328:462 (21 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7437.462-b

Letter

Public involvement in health care

Process needs to be transparent and open

The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below.

EDITOR—Florin and Dixon raise important points about the need for clarity on the issue of increased public involvement in decision making in the NHS.1 Two points are worth emphasising.

Firstly, the entire process could be reduced to a tickbox exercise in which trusts co-opt "tame" representatives to rubber stamp decisions.

Secondly, "professional" public representatives could emerge whose views are not necessarily representative of the public's and who turn up as public representatives on every committee and board.

The process by which the public is involved in making health service decisions needs to be transparent and open and may require extra effort, to ensure that the process is indeed inclusive.

Ike Anya, specialist registrar, public health

Bristol North Primary Care Trust, Bristol BS2 8EE ikechuku.anya@lshtm.ac.uk


Competing interests: IA is employed by the NHS.

  1. Florin D, Dixon J. Public involvement in health care. BMJ 2004;328: 159-161. (17 January.)[Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Public involvement in health care
Dominique Florin and Jennifer Dixon
BMJ 2004 328: 159-161. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ