Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:462 (21 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7437.462-b
| The first 100% of the full text of this article appears below. |
EDITORFlorin and Dixon raise important points about the need for clarity on the issue of increased public involvement in decision making in the NHS.1 Two points are worth emphasising.
Firstly, the entire process could be reduced to a tickbox exercise in which trusts co-opt "tame" representatives to rubber stamp decisions.
Secondly, "professional" public representatives could emerge whose views are not necessarily representative of the public's and who turn up as public representatives on every committee and board.
The process by which the public is involved in making health service decisions needs to be transparent and open and may require extra effort, to ensure that the process is indeed inclusive.
Ike Anya, specialist registrar, public health
Bristol North Primary Care Trust, Bristol BS2 8EE ikechuku.anya@lshtm.ac.uk