Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:462 (21 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7437.462
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORSection 11 of the Health and Social Care Act 2001 concerns "persons to whom... services are being or may be provided." This means that more people than current patients have to be involved "directly or through representatives" about plans and services. Florin and Dixon's philosophising about the desirability of public involvement is therefore curious.1
|
User involvement in health and social care should lead to shared power and genuine partnerships, with no short cuts or quick fixes.2 Investment in community development is needed for sustainable engagement, so that every voice can count, not just that of patients.3
Many users reject the role of a patient as inherently powerless. My experience in Wandsworth is that user participation groups in primary care practices can foster trust, responsibility, and partnership between users, practitioners, and managers. Such small scale benefits are important. Supporting practice based participation can open new channels for compliance with
Andrew Craig, partner
Moore Adamson Craig Partnership LLP, London SE21 8BT andrew@mooreadamsoncraig.co.uk