Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:461-462 (21 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7437.461-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORHussey et al produce similar findings to other recent studies about general practitioners' advice on fitness for work,1-3 but in his editor's choice Smith concludes that much of this work is philosophically untenable. General practitioners have been poorly trained in this important and undoubtedly difficult aspect of their day to day work, a challenge that the Department for Work and Pensions is anxious to address.
Smith also perpetuates the myth that general practitioners are acting solely as agents for the department, presumably in the same way that they are agents of the NHS when they issue a prescription?
Advice on fitness to work is an integral part of the clinical management of patients of working age. The obligation to record the advice on a statement (such as Form Med 3) does not detract from the doctor's overriding concern for the best clinical outcome for the patient. Good professional
Mansel Aylward, chief medical adviser
Department for Work and Pensions, London WC2N 6HT mansel.aylward@dwp.gsi.gov.uk
Read all Rapid Responses