Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:404 (14 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7436.404-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORMarshall commendably questions current trends in preventive medicine.1 He looks at cost effectiveness of cardioprotective drug treatment, including simvastatin 40 mg, by assessing pooled data from different trials. Treatment effects are balanced with costs. The expenditure for simvastatin 40 mg is calculated as prescribing costs plus additional costs for administration and laboratory tests.
A close look at the heart protection study,2 3 Marshall's main reference for statins, quickly calls this equation into question. Simvastatin 40mg was less well tolerated and less effective than portrayed by the authors.
Firstly, tolerability: against all claims simvastatin was not well tolerated. A substantial number of patients did not enter the trial after a six week run in before randomisation (63 603 entered the original screening, 32 145 went forward to the run in phase and 11 609 patients dropped out then).
Secondly, independent treatment effects: Marshall assumes that statins work independently of other
David Taylor, general practitioner principal
Birmingham B31 2HZ
Arnold Jenkins, general practitioner principal
Burnley BB10 1LG
Philipp Conradi, part time general practitioner
Birmingham B7 5DT pconradi@hotmail.com