Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:358-359 (14 February), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7436.358
Conducting life saving research properly and quickly is a moral imperative
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Every year over 200 000 babies are born with thalassaemia major. They have a life expectancy of less than 30 years and are dependent on blood transfusions. Repeated transfusions result in cirrhosis of the liver, cardiomyopathy, endocrinopathies, and death due to haemosiderosis. Desferoxamine, an iron chelator, has been used for more than 30 years to treat haemosiderosis. It is given by daily, subcutaneous, slow injection, with inconvenience and local reactions resulting in suboptimal compliance in about half the patients.1 Despite desferoxamine, cardiac disease is still responsible for 70% of all deaths in these patients. Developing an orally administered chelating agent has therefore been a major objective in the care of patients with thalassaemia. Unfortunately the development of such a drug (deferiprone) has resulted in one of the most acrimonious and destructive of conflicts between a clinical researcher (Nancy Olivieri) and a drug company (Apotex).2
w1-w4 This dispute raises several ethical issues,
Julian Savulescu, Uehiro chair in practical ethics
Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1PT (julian.savulescu@philosophy.oxford.ac.uk)
Read all Rapid Responses