Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:287 (31 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7434.287-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORWe agree with Galea et al that recall bias could be an alternative explanation for our finding that stressful events are associated with the risk of exacerbation in multiple sclerosis.
To minimise the possibility of recall bias we chose a high (weekly) sampling frequency. Nevertheless, when patients experienced an event and still had to complete the questions for the preceding week, their perception of stress may have been influenced by the relapse. In such a situation a high frequency of stress within or just before the week of the relapse would also be expected. This was not the case in our study: we found no significant increase in the number of reported stress events two weeks before an exacerbation.
Galea et al are right that increases in stressful events preceding exacerbations do not directly prove a causal relationwe do not claim that. They suggest that subclinical disease processes
R Q Hintzen, neurologist
rhintzen@xs4all.nl
D Buljevac, medical doctor
Department of Neurology, Erasmus MC, Postbox 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
W C J Hop, biostatistician
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Erasmus MC
A C J W Janssens, psychologist
Department of Medical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Erasmus MC