Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:280-282 (31 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7434.280
Warren Stevens, health economist1, Steve Kaye, virologist1, Tumani Corrah, director1
1 MRC Laboratories, PO Box 273, Banjul, Gambia, West Africa
Correspondence to: W Stevens wstevens@mrc.gm
We should stop and think about the risks of resistance, and ways of minimising them, before increasing access to antiretroviral therapy in Africa
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Demands for the introduction of antiretroviral therapy into Africa have been growing over the past few years. On the face of it, the availability of antiretroviral therapy at what seems to be an affordable price is good news. The treatment can produce dramatic clinical improvements in people with symptomatic HIV disease and, when used optimally, can delay the progression of disease. However, the potential short term gains from reducing individual morbidity and mortality may be far outweighed by the potential for the long term spread of drug resistance if the experience of adherence to treatment for tuberculosis is repeated. Without due forethought and planning, antiretroviral therapy is likely to be introduced to Africa in a random and haphazard way, with inconsistent prescribing practices and poor monitoring of therapy and adherence. This risks the rapid development and transmission of drug resistance.
Virus strains with reduced sensitivity to zidovudine, the first drug
-->
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?
Read all Rapid Responses