Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:226 (24 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7433.226-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe use by Baird et al in their clinical review of the diagnosis "autism" and "autistic spectrum disorders" confuses me.1 The authors list five outcomes in box 8 that indicate the success of therapeutic and teaching interventions and may help us to comprehend what is the cardinal feature of autism: normal use of verbal language, some use of verbal language for a range of purposes, some functional use of language, ability to use an alternative system of communication, the child's idiosyncratic communication is better understood.
In each of these five successful outcomes for autism is one constant threadthe abnormal use of language for communication. I suggest that autism is none other than thisas opposed to the delayed development of speech. If that is so, then we do not need a spectrum any more than we need an asthmatic spectrum or a diabetic spectrum.
The diagnosing clinician must decide
P V Finn Cosgrove, consultant all-age psychiatrist
Bristol Priority Clinic, Bath BA2 5YD bristolpriorityclinic@btopenworld.com
Read all Rapid Responses