Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:226 (24 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7433.226-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORIn their article on the diagnosis of autism Baird et al completely ignore context.1 They focus on an explanation within the child for the rapid rise in rates of diagnosis, implying that the only cultural factor affecting this has been low rates of recognition in the past.
The immaturity of children may be a fact of biology, but the meaning ascribed to this immaturity is a fact of culture. Without any tangible evidence of organic pathology and any biological tests to substantiate our hypothesis of a neurological dysfunction, the boundaries of the disorder can expand endlessly and are dependent on the subjective opinion of the person making the diagnosis.2
Our notions of child development are culture bound and too often create a blueprint of age dependent expectations that ordinary parents fear our children cannot meet, rather than a set of required behaviours that our children must master if
Sami Timimi, consultant child and adolescent psychiatrist
Ash Villa, Sleaford, Lincolnshire NG34 8QA stimimi@talk21.com