BMJ  2004;328:226 (24 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7433.226-a

Letter

Diagnosis of autism

Current epidemic has social context

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—In their article on the diagnosis of autism Baird et al completely ignore context.1 They focus on an explanation within the child for the rapid rise in rates of diagnosis, implying that the only cultural factor affecting this has been low rates of recognition in the past.

The immaturity of children may be a fact of biology, but the meaning ascribed to this immaturity is a fact of culture. Without any tangible evidence of organic pathology and any biological tests to substantiate our hypothesis of a neurological dysfunction, the boundaries of the disorder can expand endlessly and are dependent on the subjective opinion of the person making the diagnosis.2

Our notions of child development are culture bound and too often create a blueprint of age dependent expectations that ordinary parents fear our children cannot meet, rather than a set of required behaviours that our children must master if . . . [Full text of this article]

Sami Timimi, consultant child and adolescent psychiatrist

Ash Villa, Sleaford, Lincolnshire NG34 8QA stimimi@talk21.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Diagnosis of autism
Gillian Baird, Hilary Cass, and Vicky Slonims
BMJ 2003 327: 488-493. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ