Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:165-166 (17 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7432.165-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOROne of the proposed reasons for the death of the autopsy described by O'Grady is an increased confidence in new diagnostic tools, particularly modern imaging techniques.1 2 Surprisingly, the rate of misdiagnoses detected at autopsy (about 40%) did not improve from 1960-70, before the advent of computed tomography, ultrasound, nuclear scanning, etc, to 1980, after these technologies became widely used.3
In 2003, of 53 autopsy series identified, 42 reported major errors (clinically missed diagnoses involving a primary cause of death) and 37 reported class I errors (those most likely to have affected patient outcome).4 The median error rate was 23.5% (range 4.1%-49.8%) for major errors and 9.0% (0-20.7%) for class I errors.
Advances in imaging and diagnostic technology have not reduced the value of the autopsy. Autopsies could serve as indicators of overall performance of care systems over time or in comparison with other systems.5 Autopsies also have an
-->
Gema Frühbeck, clinical scientist
Department of Endocrinology, Medical School, University of Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain gfruhbeck@unav.es