Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:117-118 (17 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7432.117
More like Peter the Great than Ivan the Terriblebut only if they have money
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
In 1999 the Department of Health in England appointed its first health "tsar." In doing so it broke with its long tradition that only civil servants worked with ministers to develop and implement policy. Since Mike Richards became the cancer tsar (more properly, the national cancer director) a further eight health tsars and one "champion" have been appointed to shape a variety of services, including primary care, heart disease, mental health, diabetes, and services for children and older people.
Although secondment of practitioners is not new in other departments of British governmentthe Ministry of Defence relies heavily on advice from serving military officers, and Treasury officials often work with seconded economiststhe use of clinicians to direct change at a national level in health was new for England. The initiative has not been without its critics.
Tsars tend to be appointed because they are noisy and attract attention. They are usually
Harry Burns, director of public health
NHS Greater Glasgow, Glasgow G3 8YZ harry.burns@gghb.scot.nhs.uk)
Read all Rapid Responses