Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2004;328:47-48 (3 January), doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7430.47-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORAlthough the obstacles to global health posed by inadequate health research capacity, particularly in developing countries, are well documented,1-4 bureaucratic barriers preventing overseas based health academics in developed countries willing to return are hardly addressed.
|
|
Credit: GIACOMO PIROZZI/PANOS
|
Firstly, recognition of academic qualifications is an issue. Current practices of most medical councils in developing countries apparently indicate that recognition of academic qualifications operates primarily on the principle of reciprocity. Consequently, some "innocent" overseas medical academic graduates from reputable universities invariably get caught in the ideological crossfire relating to reciprocal (non-) recognition of certificates.
Advocates of a revival of academic medicine in the developing world may mediate to neutralise this obstacle by providing an international grading system that ranks medical research centres and medical and public health schools at universities by an aggregate of measures, analogous to the US stockmarket "Standard and Poor's 500" list. Such a measure would
Niyi Awofeso, conjoint senior lecturer
School of Public Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia niyiawofeso@hotmail.com