Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:1403 (13 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7428.1403-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThank you for devoting an issue of the BMJ to the important topic of communication and public perception of risk. As a public health doctor, I have long puzzled over the apparent dissonance between statistical and public interpretation of risk.
Risks imposed by others may be less acceptable than risks under individual control. In the examples covered by Bellaby,1 injuries to child passengers could be perceived by parents as under their own control. Measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination2 and variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease are, however, perceived as imposed by authority.
When comparing the risk of death from smoking and air travel, statistics tell us that air travel is incredibly safe and that smoking is not. Plane crashes induce enormous public fear, yet some 340 jumbo jets would have to crash every year to equal the toll from smoking in the United Kingdom. The media, and hence the public, seem
Rosemary J Geller, director of health strategy
Shropshire and Staffordshire Health Authority, Stafford ST16 3SR rosemary.gellerparkhouse@freeserve.co.uk