BMJ  2003;327:1361-1362 (13 December), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7428.1361

Editorial

Delayed prescriptions

Can reduce antibiotic use in acute respiratory infections

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Although a reduction has occurred in the use of antibiotics for upper respiratory tract infections, international evidence indicates that they continue to be used for these conditions.¹ This is in spite of Cochrane reviews indicating minimal or no benefit from antibiotics for sore throat, acute bronchitis, the common cold, and otitis media. This situation of potentially inappropriate prescribing prompted one commentator to suggest the use of delayed prescriptions (also known as "back-pocket," "back-up," or "as needed" prescriptions).² These are prescriptions written with a proviso that they not be used immediately and only if symptoms do not improve.

The first randomised trial of delayed prescriptions for respiratory symptoms was undertaken by Little et al (1997), who gave antibiotics, with the prescription to be filled immediately or after three days, or no antibiotics for acute sore throat.³ The immediate group filled 99% of the antibiotic prescriptions whereas the delayed group filled only . . . [Full text of this article]

(b.arroll@auckland.ac.nz)

Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, PB 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Twine, C, Gateley, C A (2006). Antibiotic prescription for patients referred to a specialist breast clinic. Postgrad. Med. J. 82: 771-773 [Abstract] [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Patient based evidence

Bernard C Boyd
bmj.com, 14 Dec 2003 [Full text]

Don't Forget the Advantages

Jay Ilangaratne
bmj.com, 15 Dec 2003 [Full text]

Delayed Prescriptions?

Anne Pauleau, et al.
bmj.com, 18 Dec 2003 [Full text]

Authors reply

Bruce Arroll, et al.
bmj.com, 31 Dec 2003 [Full text]