Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:1286 (29 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1286-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORGoodman et al said that teachers often forget to make allowances for a child's relative age.1 They also seem to forget to make allowances for a child's educational needs, intellectual potential, and already obtained academic ability. Children are not regarded as individuals in education.
Being the youngest in the year is associated with educational disadvantage only if the teacher does not make allowances for a child's ability or needs. It is not the parent that has the unreasonable expectation: it is the system, which expects everybody to function at a certain level at a certain age in their life regardless of their intelligence, ability, need, personality, or situation.
Grouping children by relative age would help solve the problem only if all those children at that particular age were at the exact same level and stage of their educational, social, and emotional development and had the same needs that
Jolanda Challita, parent
6 Lesley Crescent, Mortdale, NSW 2223, Australia challita@bigpond.com