Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:1228 (22 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1228-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORFry and Verne in their editorial concluded that sunscreens may create a false sense of security and encourage over-exposure to the sun.1 2 Sunscreens should not be relied on to prevent melanoma. Typical sunscreens only weakly absorb ultraviolet A light, which is 97% of ultraviolet radiation and is nearly as carcinogenic as ultraviolet B light. The typical protection factor for ultraviolet A is 2-4 for chemical sunscreens.3 Absorption of ultraviolet A is not included in calculation of the sun protection factor.
The authors' advice to avoid the sun would not be the best strategy for reducing overall incidence of cancer. Recommending moderate exposure to the sun would be more prudent.
Solar exposure is the main source of vitamin D. Vitamin D and its metabolites reduce the risk of cancers of the colon,4
5
w1 w2 breast,w3-w5 and prostate,w6-w8 and other cancers.w9 Since the United Kingdom is located at northern latitudes supplementation of
Cedric F Garland, professor
University of California at San Diego, School of Medicine, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0631, USA cgarland@ucsd.edu