BMJ  2003;327:1226 (22 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1226-b

Letter

In vitro fertilisation for all?

Central planning is required

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—Ashcroft confuses two issues.1 Local health care provision should reflect the overall profile of the health needs of the local population. However, this fact does not justify a local political process deciding whether childless women with a fertility problem should be given free cycles of in vitro fertilisation treatment.

Suppose that the bulk of the population of a local region is retired. The priorities might then be hip replacements and cataract surgery. Nevertheless, a significant number of couples might have fertility problems that could be treated by in vitro fertilisation. In this case, it would surely be appropriate for those couples to be treated in another region for no more than the costs of travel.

Facilitation of such a process demands exactly the kind of central planning that Ashcroft opposes.

Gillian M Lockwood, medical director

Midland Fertility Services, Centre House, Aldridge WS9 8LT gillian.lockwood@btinternet.com

Competing interests: GML is medical director of an independent in vitro fertilisation clinic that provides NHS and private . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

In vitro fertilisation for all?
Richard E Ashcroft
BMJ 2003 327: 511-512. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ