Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:1168-1169 (15 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7424.1168-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe article by Tomassini et al and the responses to it all show an unexpected degree of social naivety in that the analysis of European suicide is not mentioned or the analysis of Scandinavian suicide by Retterstol.1-4
There seems to be an overemphasis verging on theoretical pathology, on the psychological factors involved in suicide, and a commensurate ignoring of the sociological factors. As Durkheim himself noted over a century ago, there is an explanatory problem with post facto psychological explanations of behaviour whose remarkable regularity over time strongly imply that factors external to the individual are operating.
If this is so, sociological factors seem to be primary, and psychological factors important with regard to the timing of the suicide: they are a contributory, but not a sufficient, cause. The sufficient cause seems to be the social relationships in which individuals are involved. The more intense and the wider
Gerald D Sack, lecturer in social anthropology
Safed Regional Academic College, Jezre'el Valley Regional Academic College, Mitzpe Amoka, Doar Na Merom Hagalil, Israel 13802 sack@netvision.net.il