Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:1167 (15 November), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7424.1167-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe paper by English et al confirms a view that serial photography does not alter the final diagnosis of a skin lesion1; a suspicious lesion that remains will require a biopsy to confirm the pathological diagnosis.
With serial photography it is difficult to obtain a standard image. The ambient lighting and other external factors change the view of the skin lesionobjective comparisons are therefore not possible. Furthermore, photographs may not differentiate skin lesions such as pigmented seborrhoeic keratoses and melanomas.
The dermatoscope is mandatory in evaluating a skin lesion and invaluable in helping differentiate a benign or suspicious lesion. Although lesions may be assessed visually, what is required is an objective assessment that can be recorded or photographed through the dermatoscope.2 Had English et al performed their study by using the dermatoscope the results would have been of major interest. Unfortunately this study contradicts that by Del
-->
M Dalvi Humzah, consultant plastic and reconstructive surgeon
Plastic Surgery Department, Wordsley Hospital, Stourbridge, West Midlands DY8 5QX dhumzah@hotmail.com