Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:989 (25 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7421.989-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe paper by Nurse et al confirms reports by HM inspectors of prisons on the detrimental effects of isolation and lack of quality programmes in custody.1 I worked as a prison doctor before becoming deputy justice minister in the Scottish Executive in 2001-2 and subscribe strongly to community based solutions, particularly for drug related crime, since custody often worsens associated mental health problems while providing opportunities to establish networks for future drug dealing.
The courts remand increasing numbers of prisoners and imprison many for two weeks or less for fine default (in Scotland 6000/25000 admissions for fine default; similar numbers on remand). Nearly half of these prisoners, more than 80% of whom have drug problems, then reoffend. This expensive custodial approach (> £28 000 per prisoner per year) is ineffective in protecting the public, as punishment, and in preventing reoffending. Moreover, the rapid turnover of prisoners imposes an
Richard J Simpson, senior medical officer
Glasgow Problem Drug Service, Woodside Health Centre, Glasgow G20 9LR richard.simpson@hushmail.com