Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:940-941 (25 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7421.940
Which is why it has failed to tackle research misconduct
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
The first article in Britain on the subject of research misconduct was published about 23 years ago.1 Unfortunately, after 23 years we in Britain have got nowhere near tackling research misconduct. The clear signs are that we are not about to get the national body which other countries have had for years, and which our medical mandarins have continually promised us.
We have had a report from the Royal College of Physicians2which wasn't implemented; we had fine words in a report from the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh,3 about which nothing has been done; and we have had undertakings from the Academy of Medical Sciences, which again haven't been addressed. And this is rather strange if you look at the mission statements of these bodies. The Royal College of Physicians of London states that for over 450 years it has had a pivotal role in maintaining standards of
Stephen Lock, former editor BMJ
Aldeburgh, Suffolk IP15 5EE
Read all Rapid Responses