BMJ  2003;327:929 (18 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7420.929

Letter

Retraction of paper on maternal diabetes

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—In a paper in the BMJ three of us (GH, LMI, and RTL) claimed that the excess of birth defects and perinatal deaths among births in women with pregestational diabetes was significantly lower in Norway compared with the northeast of England.1 The analysis of the data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway was, however, wrong and led to a wrong conclusion.

There are codes in the registry for different types of diabetes. By mistake Norwegian data included codes for gestational diabetes in the diabetes group, although it was intended to exclude those. We failed to realise the mistake even when the possibility was raised in correspondence in the journal.2

After the error was discovered and discussed at a joint meeting in Newcastle,3 one of us (NM), a clinician, reviewed the clinical records of 696 mothers with a code for diabetes in the Norwegian registry. When the definition . . . [Full text of this article]

Gillian Hawthorne, consultant physician

Northern Diabetic Pregnancy Survey, Regional Maternity Survey Office, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA

Lorentz M Irgens, professor

lorentz.irgens@mfr.uib.no

Rolv T Lie, professor of medical statistics

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Narve Moe, professor

Medical Birth Registry of Norway, Haukeland Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway

Jak Jervell, professor

Medical Department, University Hospital of Oslo, Oslo


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Use of serial qualitative interviews to understand patients’ evolving experiences and needs
Scott A Murray, Marilyn Kendall, Emma Carduff, Allison Worth, Fiona M Harris, Anna Lloyd, Debbie Cavers, Liz Grant, and Aziz Sheikh
BMJ 2009 339: b3702. [Full Text]

When to retract?
Richard Smith
BMJ 2003 327: 883-884. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Retraction
BMJ 2003 327: 905. [Full Text] [PDF]

Outcome of pregnancy in diabetic women
Frank Johnstone, Jean Golding, Gillian Hawthorne, L M Irgens, and R T Lie
BMJ 2001 322: 614. [Extract] [Full Text]

Outcome of pregnancy in diabetic women in northeast England and in Norway, 1994-7
G Hawthorne, L M Irgens, and R T Lie
BMJ 2000 321: 730-731. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Smith, R. (2003). When to retract?. BMJ 327: 883-884 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Concerning retraction of paper on maternal diabetes
Lorentz M Irgens, et al.
bmj.com, 22 Oct 2003 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ