Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:929 (18 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7420.929
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORIn a paper in the BMJ three of us (GH, LMI, and RTL) claimed that the excess of birth defects and perinatal deaths among births in women with pregestational diabetes was significantly lower in Norway compared with the northeast of England.1 The analysis of the data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway was, however, wrong and led to a wrong conclusion.
There are codes in the registry for different types of diabetes. By mistake Norwegian data included codes for gestational diabetes in the diabetes group, although it was intended to exclude those. We failed to realise the mistake even when the possibility was raised in correspondence in the journal.2
After the error was discovered and discussed at a joint meeting in Newcastle,3 one of us (NM), a clinician, reviewed the clinical records of 696 mothers with a code for diabetes in the Norwegian registry. When the definition
Gillian Hawthorne, consultant physician
Northern Diabetic Pregnancy Survey, Regional Maternity Survey Office, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4AA
Lorentz M Irgens, professor
lorentz.irgens@mfr.uib.no
Rolv T Lie, professor of medical statistics
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National Hospital, Oslo, Norway
Narve Moe, professor
Medical Birth Registry of Norway, Haukeland Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
Jak Jervell, professor
Medical Department, University Hospital of Oslo, Oslo
Read all Rapid Responses