Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:870 (11 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7419.870-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORHaake et al performed a multi-centre randomised controlled trial of extracorporeal shock wave treatment for plantar fasciitis.1 They say that their study is definitive and they therefore recommend against any further experimental testing of this treatment, but the study has sufficient methodological flaws to render their conclusions questionable.
Although the study seems to be well designed statistically, they do not highlight that fewer than half of their patients received minimal conservative care that includes stretching exercises and casting or night splinting before their inclusion in the study (data available online in web table B).
Such interventions have been shown to be effective.2
3 Failure of such treatment is an essential aspect of the inclusion criteria for extracorporeal shock wave treatment. Including such patients in this study therefore violates one of the precepts of extracorporeal shock wave treatmentfailure of previous standard conservative care. Physical treatment is not a substitute for
James Michelson, professor, orthopaedic surgery
George Washington University School of Medicine, Medical Education Center, Room 6200, 900 23rd Street, NW, Washington, DC 20037, USA msdjdm@gwumc.edu