Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:808-809 (4 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7418.808-c
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe presence of a statin in the "Polypill" implies a favourable cost effectiveness of the anticholesterol agent for primary prevention.1 2 Medline reports 18 original studies (from 1995 to June 2003) evaluating the cost effectiveness of statins for this indication (8 independent, 10 sponsored3).
In the eight independent reports, the interstudy variations in the cost per life year gained are extremely wide ($C7700 to $US420 000 in men), which shows a profound uncertainty in the convenience of this indication of statins.
On the other hand, the 10 sponsored reports raise the question of whether the sponsor has any influence on the study. The results of these 10 papers are always in favour of the statin produced by the sponsor (10/10; 100%; P = 0.00098 by Signs test).
The figure summarises five studies; the other five (not presented in the figure because their results are not costs per life
Andrea Messori, coordinator
andreamessori@interfree.it
Benedetta Santarlasci, researcher, Sabrina Trippoli, researcher, Monica Vaiani, researcher
Laboratorio di Farmacoeconomia, c/o Pharmaceutical Service, Careggi Hospital, Viale Morgagni 85, I-50134 Florence, Italy