Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:808 (4 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7418.808
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThere has always been an element of truth in the old and slightly cynical description of "Gerifix" and "Gerifix Forte"the common collection of drugs that many elderly patients find themselves taking in and after hospital. Outside hospitals, in the effort to achieve reductions in premature or avoidable cardiovascular death and disability, many people are actually taking all or most of the components of the "Polypill,"1 and we as doctors have reasonable grounds to believe in a mass benefit from doing so.
Incredulous senior house officers may yet hear of all these things and may also learn that meta-analysis is commonly more reliable than inspecting the results of a single trial, particularly if its power is low.
Wald and Law have produced a good paper.1 There are a lot more bits of wisdom camouflaged as cynicism in the profession, and subjecting these "folk stories" to scientific analysis is at
Adrian K Midgley, general practitioner
Exeter EX1 2QS bmj@92tr.freeserve.co.uk