BMJ  2003;327:781-782 (4 October), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7418.781

Paper

Family attitudes to research using samples taken at coroner's postmortem examinations: review of records

Christopher Womack, consultant histopathologist1, Alison L Jack, senior pathology liaison nurse1

1 Department of Cellular Pathology, Peterborough District Hospital, Peterborough PE3 6DA

Correspondence to: C Womack chris.womack@pbh-tr.nhs.uk

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Introduction

The response of families asked for cadaveric blood and tissue may have been affected by adverse publicity about hospitals retaining tissues and organs removed at post mortem without consent. The tissue bank at Peterborough was asked to contribute control samples to an English Department of Health funded study to validate tests for viral markers in postmortem material. The study required samples of cadaveric blood (10-20 ml), lymph node (one intrathoracic), and liver (2 cm3).1 Peterborough was selected because it does not have a high prevalence of bloodborne viral infections and because the tissue bank had the infrastructure to retrieve postmortem tissue for research.2 Participation in this study enabled us to evaluate the attitudes of families who were asked to allow the pathologist to take samples for research during a postmortem examination being done at the request of the coroner.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Reasons for refusal among families asked by coroner's officers to . . . [Full text of this article]

 

Participants, methods, and results

Comment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

One-time general consent for research on biological samples
David Wendler
BMJ 2006 332: 544-547. [Full Text] [PDF]

Consent to using human tissue
Peter Furness
BMJ 2003 327: 759-760. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Death of the teaching autopsy
Gregory O'Grady
BMJ 2003 327: 802-803. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Obtaining consent for autopsy
Michael B McDermott
BMJ 2003 327: 804-806. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Elliot, J G, Ford, D L, Beard, J F, Fitzgerald, K N, Robinson, P J, James, A L (2008). Informed consent for the study of retained tissues from postmortem examination following sudden infant death. J. Med. Ethics 34: 742-746 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Wendler, D. (2006). One-time general consent for research on biological samples.. BMJ 332: 544-547 [Full text]  
  • McDermott, M (2004). The continuing decline of autopsies in clinical trials: is there any way back?. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 89: F198-F199 [Full text]  
  • Furness, P. (2003). Consent to using human tissue. BMJ 327: 759-760 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ