BMJ  2003;327:745-748 (27 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7417.745

Education and debate

Strategies to help patients understand risks

John Paling, research director1

1 Risk Communication Institute, 5822 NW 91 Boulevard, Gainesville, FL 32653, USA drp@trci.info

Explaining risks to patients in an effective way is an essential part of ensuring that consent is "informed." A consultant in risk communication discusses the strategies that can help doctors to communicate risks clearly, and thereby also build closer relationships with their patients


Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig 2 Paling Perspective Scale© —for giving perspective to risks of low order of probability.16 From research report by Small P et al17

 

Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (63K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig 3 Paling Palette© —for displaying most medical risks with a probability of higher than 1 in 1000.16 The doctor or genetic counsellor fills in the relevant data while sitting beside the patient. This format shows the estimates of positive and negative outcomes simultaneously and presents unambiguous visual representations of the probabilities. The patient may take a printout home for further consideration, or the form may be signed by the patient and a copy kept on file

 

Figure Removed (Available Only in the Full Text)
View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
  		Fig 4 Revised Paling Perspective Scale© —for displaying risks covering widely different orders of magnitude16

 

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Effective risk communication is the basis for informed patient consent for medical treatment, yet until recently doctors have lagged behind other professionals in learning this skill. In other industries where risks have to be conveyed to the public (such as chemical, nuclear, water, and food industries) usually only a few people carry out this task on behalf of their organisations and they are specially trained. In contrast, in health care (where the risks are usually far higher and more uncertain and complex) almost every doctor who interacts with patients has to communicate information on risk, yet few have any training.

Specific strategies can help to remedy this deficiency and improve patients' understanding of risks. Doctors can now choose from a "toolbox" of simple, practical, time efficient techniques that benefit the widest possible variety of patients.

I have taught risk communication in risk prone professions outside medicine for over a decade.1 . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Communicating risks
Adrian Edwards
BMJ 2003 327: 691-692. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight
Gerd Gigerenzer and Adrian Edwards
BMJ 2003 327: 741-744. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Garcia-Retamero, R., Galesic, M. (2009). Communicating Treatment Risk Reduction to People With Low Numeracy Skills: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. AJPH 99: 2196-2202 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Price, H. C, Dudley, C., Barrow, B., Kennedy, I., Griffin, S. J, Holman, R. R (2009). Use of focus groups to develop methods to communicate cardiovascular disease risk and potential for risk reduction to people with type 2 diabetes. Fam Pract 26: 351-358 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Maskrey, N., Greenhalgh, T. (2009). Getting a better grip on research: the fate of those who ignore history. InnovAiT 2: 619-625 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Visvanathan, K., Chlebowski, R. T., Hurley, P., Col, N. F., Ropka, M., Collyar, D., Morrow, M., Runowicz, C., Pritchard, K. I., Hagerty, K., Arun, B., Garber, J., Vogel, V. G., Wade, J. L., Brown, P., Cuzick, J., Kramer, B. S., Lippman, S. M. (2009). American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update on the Use of Pharmacologic Interventions Including Tamoxifen, Raloxifene, and Aromatase Inhibition for Breast Cancer Risk Reduction. JCO 27: 3235-3258 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Keller, C., Siegrist, M. (2009). Effect of Risk Communication Formats on Risk Perception Depending on Numeracy. Med Decis Making 29: 483-490 [Abstract]  
  • Zier, L. S., Burack, J. H., Micco, G., Chipman, A. K., Frank, J. A., White, D. B. (2009). Surrogate Decision Makers' Responses to Physicians' Predictions of Medical Futility. Chest 136: 110-117 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Schneeweiss, S., Avorn, J. (2009). Antipsychotic Agents and Sudden Cardiac Death -- How Should We Manage the Risk?. NEJM 360: 294-296 [Full text]  
  • Evans, L. R., Boyd, E. A., Malvar, G., Apatira, L., Luce, J. M., Lo, B., White, D. B. (2009). Surrogate Decision-Makers' Perspectives on Discussing Prognosis in the Face of Uncertainty. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 179: 48-53 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Curtis, J. R., White, D. B. (2008). Practical Guidance for Evidence-Based ICU Family Conferences. Chest 134: 835-843 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Curtis, J. R. (2008). Palliative and end-of-life care for patients with severe COPD. Eur Respir J 32: 796-803 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Macario, E., Montealegre Boyte, R. (2008). Lost in Translation: Tips for Avoiding Translation "Travesties". Health Promot Pract 9: 216-219  
  • Siegrist, M., Orlow, P., Keller, C. (2008). The Effect of Graphical and Numerical Presentation of Hypothetical Prenatal Diagnosis Results on Risk Perception. Med Decis Making 28: 567-574 [Abstract]  
  • Goodyear-Smith, F., Arroll, B., Chan, L., Jackson, R., Wells, S., Kenealy, T. (2008). Patients Prefer Pictures to Numbers to Express Cardiovascular Benefit From Treatment. Ann Fam Med 6: 213-217 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Lipkus, I. M. (2007). Numeric, Verbal, and Visual Formats of Conveying Health Risks: Suggested Best Practices and Future Recommendations. Med Decis Making 27: 696-713 [Abstract]  
  • Wang, C., Bowen, D. J., Kardia, S. L. R. (2005). Research and Practice Opportunities at the Intersection of Health Education, Health Behavior, and Genomics. Health Educ Behav 32: 686-701 [Abstract]  
  • Walter, F. M., Emery, J. (2005). 'Coming Down the Line'-- Patients' Understanding of Their Family History of Common Chronic Disease. Ann Fam Med 3: 405-414 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Elmore, J. G., Gigerenzer, G. (2005). Benign Breast Disease -- The Risks of Communicating Risk. NEJM 353: 297-299 [Full text]  
  • Elmore, J. G., Armstrong, K., Lehman, C. D., Fletcher, S. W. (2005). Screening for Breast Cancer. JAMA 293: 1245-1256 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Bulliard, J-L, Levi, F (2004). Women's perception of mammography screening. Int J Epidemiol 33: 903-904 [Full text]  
  • Cantillon, P. (2004). Is evidence based patient choice feasible?. BMJ 329: 39-39 [Full text]  
  • Edwards, A (2004). Flexible rather than standardised approaches to communicating risks in health care. Qual Saf Health Care 13: 169-170 [Full text]  
  • Knapp, P, Raynor, D K, Berry, D C (2004). Comparison of two methods of presenting risk information to patients about the side effects of medicines. Qual Saf Health Care 13: 176-180 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Edwards, A. (2003). Communicating risks. BMJ 327: 691-692 [Full text]  
  • Gigerenzer, G., Edwards, A. (2003). Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight. BMJ 327: 741-744 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

We need more evidence of effectiveness about ways to communicate risk to patients - a proposal.
Victor M. Montori, et al.
bmj.com, 3 Oct 2003 [Full text]
Relative risk reduction; Absolute risk reduction and number needed to Treat: RAT DIAGRAM
Jaishen Rajah
bmj.com, 4 Oct 2003 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ