BMJ  2003;327:736-740 (27 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7417.736

Education and debate

Risk communication in practice: the contribution of decision aids

Annette M O'Connor, professor1, France Légaré, clinical teacher2, Dawn Stacey, doctoral candidate1

1 Ottawa Health Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital, Civic Campus, C4-1053 Carling Ave, Ottawa, ON, Canada K1Y 4E9, 2 Department of Family Medicine, Laval University, Quebec, QC, Canada G1K 7P4

Correspondence to: A O'Connor aoconnor@ohri.ca

As patients want to participate more in decision making, and as the range of medical options expands, clinicians are challenged to improve their communication of risk and supportive skills. Are practitioners' counselling skills up to the job?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Different decisions require different strategies to communicate risk and support decisions, and we consider that two broad classes of decisions exist for patients. The first class lies in the area of "effective" health services, in which the benefits are large compared with harms—the participation of patients improves control of chronic conditions1 and the widespread underuse of these beneficial options.2 The second is in "preference sensitive" health services, in which the ratios of benefit to harm are either uncertain or dependent on patient values2—participation of patients improves quality of decisions and prevents overuse in the subset of informed patients who don't value the options.3


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Differences in decision support for effective versus preference sensitive medical options

 

We investigated practical and effective approaches that doctors and practitioners can use when counselling patients about these two classes of decisions. Box 1 shows the sources we used. These approaches should help patients to understand . . . [Full text of this article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Coaching to support patients in making decisions
Annette M O’Connor, Dawn Stacey, and France Légaré
BMJ 2008 336: 228-229. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Communicating risk: the main work of doctors
Richard Smith
BMJ 2003 327: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Communicating risks
Adrian Edwards
BMJ 2003 327: 691-692. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Whitney, S. N., Holmes-Rovner, M., Brody, H., Schneider, C., McCullough, L. B., Volk, R. J., McGuire, A. L. (2008). Beyond Shared Decision Making: An Expanded Typology of Medical Decisions. Med Decis Making 28: 699-705 [Abstract]  
  • Deegan, P. E., Rapp, C., Holter, M., Riefer, M. (2008). Best Practices: A Program to Support Shared Decision Making in an Outpatient Psychiatric Medication Clinic. Psychiatr. Serv. 59: 603-605 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Karanicolas, P. J., Kunz, R., Guyatt, G. H. (2008). Point: Evidence-Based Medicine Has a Sound Scientific Base. Chest 133: 1067-1071 [Full text]  
  • O'Connor, A. M, Stacey, D., Legare, F. (2008). Coaching to support patients in making decisions. BMJ 336: 228-229 [Full text]  
  • Barnato, A. E., Llewellyn-Thomas, H. A., Peters, E. M., Siminoff, L., Collins, E. D., Barry, M. J. (2007). Communication and Decision Making in Cancer Care: Setting Research Priorities for Decision Support/Patients' Decision Aids. Med Decis Making 27: 626-634 [Abstract]  
  • Stebbing, C., Wong, I. C K, Kaushal, R., Jaffe, A. (2007). The role of communication in paediatric drug safety. Arch. Dis. Child. 92: 440-445 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Krist, A. H., Woolf, S. H., Johnson, R. E., Kerns, J. W. (2007). Patient Education on Prostate Cancer Screening and Involvement in Decision Making. Ann Fam Med 5: 112-119 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Krist, A. H., Woolf, S. H., Johnson, R. E. (2007). How Physicians Approach Prostate Cancer Screening Before and After Losing a Lawsuit. Ann Fam Med 5: 120-125 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Drife, J. (2007). Putting risk into context. The Obstetrician and Gynaecologist 9: 42-47 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Ropka, M. E., Wenzel, J., Phillips, E. K., Siadaty, M., Philbrick, J. T. (2006). Uptake rates for breast cancer genetic testing: a systematic review.. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 15: 840-855 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Johnson, B. R., Schwartz, A., Goldberg, J., Koerber, A. (2006). A chairside aid for shared decision making in dentistry: a randomized controlled trial.. J Dent Educ 70: 133-141 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Verhoef, M. J., Balneaves, L. G., Boon, H. S., Vroegindewey, A. (2005). Reasons for and Characteristics Associated With Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among Adult Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review. Integr Cancer Ther 4: 274-286 [Abstract]  
  • Scott Richardson, W, Dowding, D. (2005). Teaching evidence-based practice on foot. Evid. Based Nurs. 8: 100-103 [Full text]  
  • Woolf, S. H., Chan, E. C.Y., Harris, R., Sheridan, S. L., Braddock, C. H. III, Kaplan, R. M., Krist, A., O'Connor, A. M., Tunis, S. (2005). Promoting Informed Choice: Transforming Health Care To Dispense Knowledge for Decision Making. ANN INTERN MED 143: 293-300 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Richardson, W S. (2005). Teaching evidence-based practice on foot. Evid. Based Med. 10: 98-101 [Full text]  
  • Hu, W, Kerridge, I, Kemp, A (2005). Risk, rationality, and regret: responding to the uncertainty of childhood food anaphylaxis. Med. Humanities 31: 12-16 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Kerr, J., Engel, J., Eckel, R., Holzel, D. (2005). Survival for rectal cancer patients and international comparisons. Ann Oncol 16: 664-672 [Abstract] [Full text]  
  • Reuben, D. B., Naeim, A. (2004). Perspectives, Preferences, Care Practices, and Outcomes in Late-Stage Cancer Patients: Connecting the Dots. JCO 22: 4869-4871 [Full text]  
  • Heesen, C., Kasper, J., Segal, J., Kopke, S., Muhlhauser, I. (2004). Decisional role preferences, risk knowledge and information interests in patients with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 10: 643-650 [Abstract]  
  • Guyatt, G., Cook, D., Haynes, B. (2004). Evidence based medicine has come a long way. BMJ 329: 990-991 [Full text]  
  • Cantillon, P. (2004). Is evidence based patient choice feasible?. BMJ 329: 39-39 [Full text]  
  • Edwards, A. (2003). Communicating risks. BMJ 327: 691-692 [Full text]  



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ