BMJ  2003;327:692-693 (27 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7417.692

Editorial

The role of risk communication in shared decision making

First let's get to choices

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

I want to feel like a rational and autonomous person, even when I'm ill. Doctors ought to use their power (legal and knowledge) not only to relieve suffering but to enhance patients' autonomy.¹ A prescription for this is shared decision making, a middle ground between "nanny knows best" paternalism and rampant consumerism—an ideal that aims to reconcile the fact of professional power with the ethic of informed choice.

Laws are leaning towards informed choice. For example, the supreme court of Canada in 1980 ruled that doctors have a legal obligation to disclose, unasked, whatever a reasonable person in that patient's particular position would want to know before making a decision. The ethical positions of medical guilds have more or less followed suit: "Duties of a doctor [are to] give patients information in a way they can understand; respect the rights of patients to be fully involved in decisions about their . . . [Full text of this article]

University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 2B5 (wgod@interchange.ubc.ca)

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    StumbleUpon    Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Communicating risk: We as doctors are not alone

Thomas W V Daniels
BMJ 2003 327: 1403. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Communicating risk: But does it work, Doctor?

Joanne Protheroe
BMJ 2003 327: 1404. [Extract] [Full Text]

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Lawrence, R E, Curlin, F A (2009). Autonomy, religion and clinical decisions: findings from a national physician survey. J. Med. Ethics 35: 214-218 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• McCaffery, K., Irwig, L., Bossuyt, P. (2007). Patient Decision Aids to Support Clinical Decision Making: Evaluating the Decision or the Outcomes of the Decision. Med Decis Making 27: 619-625 [Abstract]  
• Hamilton, C., Adolphs, S., Nerlich, B. (2007). The meanings of 'risk': a view from corpus linguistics. Discourse Society 18: 163-181 [Abstract]  
• Young, A., Carr, G., Hunt, R., McCracken, W., Skipp, A., Tattersall, H. (2006). Informed Choice and Deaf Children: Underpinning Concepts and Enduring Challenges. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ 11: 322-336 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Durso, S. C. (2006). Using clinical guidelines designed for older adults with diabetes mellitus and complex health status.. JAMA 295: 1935-1940 [Abstract] [Full text]  
• Thorne, S., Hislop, T. G., Kuo, M., Armstrong, E.-A. (2006). Hope and Probability: Patient Perspectives of the Meaning of Numerical Information in Cancer Communication. Qual Health Res 16: 318-336 [Abstract]  
• Daniels, T. W V (2003). Communicating risk: We as doctors are not alone. BMJ 327: 1403-1403 [Full text]  
• Protheroe, J. (2003). Communicating risk: But does it work, Doctor?. BMJ 327: 1404-1404 [Full text]  
• Edwards, A. (2003). Communicating risks. BMJ 327: 691-692 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

But does it work, Doctor?

Joanne Protheroe
bmj.com, 1 Oct 2003 [Full text]

Online poll

Find out more >>