Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:683 (20 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7416.683-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITOROver 10 years ago Barker et al postulated the hypothesis of fetal programming by showing that low birthweight babies had a higher mortality from ischaemic heart disease.1 Subsequently, fast postnatal catch-up growth was found to be an additional risk factor for ischaemic heart disease,2 showing that early childhood programming was as important as the milieu in the womb. The most important form of early childhood programming and the form most amenable to beneficial intervention is nutritionparticularly breast feeding, or the lack of it.
Forsyth et al studied long chain fatty acid supplementation in infant formula and later blood pressure in childhood, and their findings will no doubt greatly influence the strategies of infant formula companies for years to come.3 However, the key finding should be that breast feeding does it all naturally, and for free. Sufficient evidence suggests that human milk, besides its role in preventing acute childhood
Yap-Seng Chong, assistant professor
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, National University of Singapore, Lower Kent Ridge Rd, 119074 Singapore obgcys@nus.edu.sg