Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:642 (20 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7416.642
Ray Moynihan
Washington, DC
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
A bill before the US Congress calls on health authorities to investigate whether expensive new drugs offer value for money, by comparing their risks and benefits with other treatments and older drugs.
![]()
|
|
Two members of the US House of Representatives, Jo Ann Emerson (Republican, Missouri) and Tom Allen (Democrat, Maine), are sponsoring a bill that would require federal funding for the evaluation of the cost effectiveness of new drugs Credit: AP PHOTO/JOSE GOITA Credit: AP PHOTO/PAT WELLENBACH
|
Currently new drugs are approved on the basis of their superiority over a placebo, with no requirement to show an advantage over existing treatments or cheaper generic pills.
If passed, the new legislation would see US taxpayers spending $75m (£47m; €67m) in 2004 to fund studies of the cost effectiveness of the nation's most expensive classes of drugssomething done routinely in other countries but a move that is bitterly opposed by the drug
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?