Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:621 (13 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7415.621-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORCarney and Geddes predict that most parties will be reasonably satisfied with the appraisal of electroconvulsive therapy by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE).1 2 Our clinical experience is that many patients who may benefit from electroconvulsive therapy will be denied it under these guidelines.
Apparently, the NICE appraisal panel did not include a single psychiatrist, which may partly explain why clinical experience of the potential benefits of maintenance electroconvulsive therapy, as described in many reports,3 seems to have been discounted.
The recommendations from NICE have also not acknowledged the different potential for memory disruption and cognitive side effects arising from bilateral as opposed to unilateral electroconvulsive therapy.4 Given the concerns about memory disturbance as a side effect of bilateral electroconvulsive therapy, this is a surprising omission.
NICE recommends that the use of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive illness should be restricted to patients with severe depressive illness or
Catherine Cole, specialist registrar in psychiatry, Robert Tobiansky, consultant old age psychiatrist
robert.tobiansky@bhct-tr.nthames.nhs.uk Barnet, Enfield, and Haringey Mental Health NHS Trust, Colindale Hospital, London NW9 5HG