BMJ  2003;327:550-553 (6 September), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.550

Education and debate

Reforming clinical research and development in England

Nick McNally, assistant director of research and development1, Susan Kerrison, assistant director (research governance)1, Allyson M Pollock, director of research and development1

1 University College London Hospitals NHS Trust, London NW1 2LT

Correspondence to: N McNally nick.mcnally@uclh.nhs.uk

The United Kingdom is trying to bring more non-governmental funding into NHS research through partnerships with the commercial and voluntary sectors. But it is still unclear exactly how the reforms in England will work and how trusts will resolve the tensions between patients' needs, financial viability, and the commercial exploitation of research findings

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Essential research into health services is often unattractive to commercial sector funders and requires government support.1 Although appreciable NHS funding has been earmarked for this purpose, critics have argued that much of the budget has disappeared into the general funds for service delivery.2 In 2000, the Department of Health announced a major overhaul of health related research within the NHS aimed at providing a clearer strategic direction.3 The reforms signal an increased role for the commercial sector in the identification of strategic objectives, setting priorities, and in the delivery and exploitation of clinical research. This paper provides an overview of the new funding and organisational arrangements for NHS research in England.

Funding of health research in the United Kingdom is complex. Although most health related research is funded from the commercial sector, the Department of Health is a major contributor (table). In 2002-03 the Department of Health contributed . . . [Full text of this article]

-->
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Articles

Medical academia is failing patients and clinicians
Peter M Rothwell
BMJ 2006 332: 863-864. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Best research
Allyson M Pollock, Nick McNally, and Sue Kerrison
BMJ 2006 332: 247-248. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Dead issue
Douglas Kamerow
BMJ 2003 327: E255. [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

  • Rothwell, P. M (2006). Medical academia is failing patients and clinicians.. BMJ 332: 863-864 [Full text]  
  • Pollock, A. M, McNally, N., Kerrison, S. (2006). Best research. BMJ 332: 247-248 [Full text]  
  • Chen, F., Majeed, A. (2005). Primary care trusts and primary care research. BMJ 330: 56-57 [Full text]  
  • Kerrison, S., McNally, N., Pollock, A. M (2003). United Kingdom research governance strategy. BMJ 327: 553-556 [Full text]  

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

We need to know their interests
susanne McCabe
bmj.com, 12 Sep 2003 [Full text]
Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student BMJ