BMJ  2003;327:448 (23 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7412.448-c

Letter

Theme issue for patients

Why does the media want to lead doctors?

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—The editorial comment by Smith is characteristic of the worst kind of wrong thinking—in that it is only half wrong and so escapes comment on the basis of the part that is half right.1

He is right that we all consider patient interests of the greatest importance and acknowledge the need to represent their views in clinical issues. He is right that the interests of individual patients have sometimes been placed second to the educational value of presenting them. The recent departures with evolving case histories were interesting, including the patients' contribution. However, he is wrong on all the rest. He is wrong to scorn the NHS on the basis that it does not share the priorities and infrastructure of a commercial supermarket. He is wrong to consider it offensive to patients that doctors write professional letters to each other that contain information that is more complex and . . . [Full text of this article]

-->

David A de Berker, consultant dermatologist

Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol BS2 8HW david.deberker@ubht.swest.nhs.uk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Relevant Article

Preparing for partnership
Richard Smith
BMJ 2003 326: 0. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Rapid Responses:

Read all Rapid Responses

Voice of common sense
Diane-Marie Campbell
bmj.com, 22 Aug 2003 [Full text]



Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ