Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:342 (9 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7410.342-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORMedical equipment is also presented with studies whose impartiality is open to question.1 At worst, the research is blatant hype.
The relationship between industry and research is not often scrutinised. In my discipline of midwifery, electronic fetal monitoring has the dubious honour of having been widely implemented without clear evidence of efficacy or safety. In the decades since it has failed to fulfil its much touted promise of better outcomes.
Artificial breastmilk substitutes are another example. The relationship between industry and health services does not always bear scrutiny. It seems to be worst in the United States, where women have samples foisted on them as they leave maternity wards because the hospital has promised the manufacturer that these "gifts" will be distributed in return for discounted prices on the product for inhospital use.
That healthcare professionals can be bought for a self adhesive memo pad,
pen, coffee mug,
Rachel Myr, midwife
Sørlandet Sykehus Kristiansand, Norway rmyr@online.no