Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:342 (9 August), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7410.342
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe relationship between the pharmaceutical industry and the medical profession is natural and can be constructive and cooperative, as well as dishonourable and damaging.1
Any debate on the influence of marketing on decision making and health outcome is considered to be too doctrinaire to be worth while. The subdued response to the theme issue from hospital practitioners is testimony to their belief that it is futile. The market has us all in its grip.
Decisions in cancer care, for example, are largely grounded in evidence when it exists. Despite the army of representatives preaching their company gospels, the existence of guidelines, protocols, and consensus statements make it difficult to influence the influential. However, the press often carries stories of another cure for cancer, and the health service is frequently accused of not providing a life saving drug. The industry thrives on this publicity.
Promotion of new chemotherapies is
K S Madhavan, senior registrar
Radiation Oncology Department, St Luke's Hospital, Dublin 6, Republic of Ireland ksmadhavanuk@yahoo.co.uk