Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:226 (26 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7408.226
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORRather than dwell on shortcomings in medical practice or the law on assisted suicide in Switzerland, the Netherlands or elsewhere, doctors in England, not just Gardner,1 would help their patients more by asking what happens in the United Kingdom and why some terminally ill patients choose to end their lives in far from ideal circumstances in Zurich.
Gardner's objection to assisted dying lying alongside palliative care relies on the unproved assumption that if people knew enough about symptom management, there would be no call for it.
Expectations of palliative care are very high, as are the claims of its
practitioners, but it cannot control everything even in terminal malignancy.
It is debatable whether hospices have deliberately sequestered these aspects
of dying within their walls, or whether a dying-denying public has chosen not
to know or inquire about these aspects of dying with their accompanying losses
of dignity and
Ramanand M Kalbag, retired neurosurgeon
Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 3QE ramkalbag@tiscali.co.uk