Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:218-220 (26 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7408.218
Tony Walter, reader in sociology1
1 Department of Sociology, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6AA j.a.walter@reading.ac.uk
Dominated by religion in the past and by medicine in the present: the idea of what constitutes a good death has changed in different cultures and societies throughout history, perhaps nowhere more so than in our globalised, Western cultures. After a period of individualisation, shared experiences with fellow sufferers now seem to be increasing in popularity
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
Here is an account of the death of a French peasant in the 19th century:
| "She contracted a summer cholera. After four days she asked to see
the village priest, who came and wanted to give her the last rites. 'Not yet,
M. le curé; I'll let you know when the time comes.' Two days later: 'Go
and tell M. le curé to bring me Extreme Unction.'
"1
|
This woman died a good death according to the lights of her society, but
this is very different from the good death of modern Western societies.
Firstly, she wanted to see the priest, not the doctor; today, dying is ruled
not by religion but by medicine. Secondly, she died in a local community in
which everyone knew their script; today, palliative care encourages
individuals to write their own scripts for dying, as they do for living.
Thirdly, the ars moriendi of her
-->-->
![]()
CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
StumbleUpon
Technorati What's this?