Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:164 (19 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7407.164
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORIn their decision analysis Sterling et al hypothesise but offer no evidence that the efficacy of DOTS (directly observed treatment, short course) has ever been diminished by DOTS-plus.1 On the contrary, under the current rigorous procedure for obtaining second line drugs at drastically reduced prices, the Green Light Committee of the World Health Organization assures that only programmes with demonstrably strong DOTS and DOTS-plus components are approved, and then only under the continuous, close supervision of the committee.2
Sterling et al used a 47% cure rate for multidrug resistant tuberculosis
under DOTS, but the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported
cure rates as low as 5% in
Russia.3 Moreover,
Migliori et al acknowledged a 25% rate of late failures among patients with
chronic multidrug resistant tuberculosis in Russia who were smear negative
(and thus considered cured) at the end of treatment, indicating that the true
cure
Edward A Nardell, associate professor
Department of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA enardell@pih.org