Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:161-162 (19 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7407.161-b
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe results of Coste et al should be interpreted with some caution.1 They raise questions about the validity of such a small group of 2585 and of split sampling. An analysis is required on the amount of training of smear takers, laboratory staff, and cytopathologists. The contrast in appearance between conventional smears and thin layer slides will make it difficult to eliminate bias.
In Lothian 15 practices, which include areas of highest urban deprivation, are now in their fourth year of using ThinPrep samples as part of the routine cervical smear programme. The table shows the results.
|
Eighty per cent of Lothian's practices have had to continue to use
conventional slide cytology, and their results continue to match the
"before" data for the 15 practices. Pathology at colposcopy, which
like cytology
Michael W Whitley, general practitioner
Moira Park Surgery, Edinburgh EH7 6RU mwhitley@moirapark.co.uk