Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:104 (12 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7406.104-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORWith reference to the editorial by McKee et al on smoke free hospitals,1 to bar smoking for inpatients with smoking related disease seems reasonable.
To coerce smokers who happen to be in hospital with an unrelated condition into accepting smoke free behaviour as a condition of their care may be questionable.
When patients have no prospect of benefit from smoking cessation, and enforced abstention aggravates their existing distress, they are being managed unethically. Their best interests as a patient (which should be the medical profession's prime concern) are being subjugated to a broader policy that does them harm.
I have been asked by relatives to prescribe nicotine replacement for a
terminally ill patient, whose last days in hospital were made worse for
nicotine withdrawal. Also one of my patients with extensive stroke related
brain damage and end stage peripheral vascular disease declined admission for
adequate nursing care and
Stephen Head, general practice principal
Middleton Lodge, Newark, Nottinghamshire NG22 9SZ shead@doctors.org.uk
Read all Rapid Responses