BMJ  2003;327:54 (5 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.54-a

Letter

"Author pays" publishing model

Strategy is needed to get from A to B

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

EDITOR—With reference to the editorial by Delamothe et al,1 last year my library paid €2.8m (£1.9m; $3.2m) for subscriptions to refereed journals. We could have saved this amount in a completely open access world, as all articles would be freely available on the internet.

Also, we had to pay for the refereeing, editing, and posting on the internet of the articles that my university published. It concerned 1413 articles. To the amount of €500 each, this makes €706 500. So for me there is no debate about the question in which world scholarly communication is cheaper. Moreover, the ultimate result is far more accessible in the open access world than in the subscription world.

The point is, however: how do we get from A to B? We cannot do away with the old journals before we have the new ones in place, with their impact factors and brands. . . . [Full text of this article]

Leo J M Waaijers, university librarian

PO Box 9100, 6700 HA Wageningen, Netherlands leo.waaijers@wur.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to StumbleUpon StumbleUpon   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Relevant Article

Scientific literature's open sesame?
Tony Delamothe, Fiona Godlee, and Richard Smith
BMJ 2003 326: 945-946. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Access jobs at BMJ Careers
Whats new online at Student 

BMJ