Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;327:52 (5 July), doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7405.52-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORThe belief of Hurst and Mauron that physician assisted suicide is not entirely contained within the framework of medicine is correct.1 Physician assisted suicide entails a philosophical value judgment that an individual life is no longer worthy to be lived. The authors do not give us any basis for making these value judgments, but modern bioethics theory creates hierarchies of human worth which are then used to justify medical discrimination.2
The authors cite a notional 0.3% rate of assisted suicide in Holland,
although the definition of euthanasia in Holland is limited to "the
deliberate termination of another's life at his request." This rules out
involuntary and non-voluntary euthanasia by definition, but there are several
thousand cases yearly in Holland where patients' lives are shortened by
deliberate active intervention. This includes infanticide. Twenty per cent of
the previously unreported cases of euthanasia in Holland involved ending a
life without
Gregory Gardner, assistant general practitioner
Swanpool Medical Centre, Tipton DY4 0UB g.gardner@euphony.net
Read all Rapid Responses