Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;326:1397 (21 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7403.1397-a
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORMean mortality of almost 10% and 30% (max 50%) is reported for elective and emergency gastro-oesophageal surgery in 29 units.1 Yet none had underperformed. A benchmark is set even though institutions were not randomised.
A multifactorial model is created by using POSSUM to fit this dataset.2 POSSUM's overpredicting tendency is compounded by duplication of identical risk factors. The control charts justify mortality for low workload when guidelines preclude small numbers. It is unclear if operative parameters comply with original definitions2 and whether physiological scores incorporate resuscitation. In our institution, 70% of emergencies did not meet criteria but resulted in an exaggerated POSSUM score.
A new formula based on prospective validated data is crucial in
subspecialty subgroup
analysis.3 Bias is
inevitable if few curative, palliative, oesophageal, and gastric cases, are
combined when surgeons vary in their operability rates. It is unwise to
compare a transhiatal oesophagectomy with a three
George A Khoury, consultant surgeon
Conquest Hospital, East Sussex NHS Trust, St Leonards on Sea, TN37 7RD shw000@msn.com