Jump to: Page Content, Site Navigation, Site Search,
You are seeing this message because your web browser does not support basic web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.
BMJ 2003;326:1329 (14 June), doi:10.1136/bmj.326.7402.1329
| The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below. |
EDITORPatients rarely participate in the planning, conduct, or interpretation of medical research.1 2 We explored involving patients in a primary care research meeting, through the PARTNERS (Patients and Researchers Together at NAPCRG Evaluating Research Studies) project. We invited six patients to participate in the annual meeting of the North American primary care research group. They varied by age, sex, education, occupation, and nationality. None was involved in health research, services, or advocacy. The study was approved, and the patients gave written informed consent.
The experience was gratifying. Patients participated enthusiastically,
showing great interest in the process and content of the meeting. The patients
were very similar to the professionals in their evaluations of 131 research
presentations, using 5 point Likert scales. Patient ratings were not
significantly different from professional ratings on the following dimensions:
appropriateness, originality, importance, methods, presentation, and audience
interaction. Only on validity of conclusions did patients
William R Phillips, clinical professor
Department of Family Medicine, Box 356390, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98185-6390, USA bphillips@fammed.washington.edu
Garry D Grams, director
Division of Behavioural Medicine, Department of Family Practice, Faculty of Medicine, 5804 Fairview Avenue, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z3